Level 4, 20 Grenfell Street,
Adelaide SA  5000

Phone: 08 8231 1888
Fax: 08 8231 3888

Email: admin@crase.com.au





 
Latest News
Hot Issues
Businesses ghosting the ATO targeted in debt collection blitz
Claiming the tax-free threshold: getting it right
Aussies tired of ‘dodgy tax criminals’, warns ATO
Protect your small business by following these essential steps.
Super guarantee a focus area for ATO business debt collection
Controversial ‘Airbnb tax’ set to become law
Withholding for foreign residents: an ATO focus area
1 in 3 crypto owners confused about tax, study reveals
20 Years of Silicon Valley Trends: 2004 - 2024 Insights
ATO reveals common rental property errors from data-matching program
New SMSF expense rules: what you need to know
Government releases details on luxury car tax changes
Treasurer unveils design details for payday super
6 steps to create a mentally healthy and vibrant workplace
What are the government’s intentions with negative gearing?
Small business decries ‘unfair’ payday super changes
The Leaders Who Refused to Step Down 1939 - 2024
Time for a superannuation check-up?
Scam alert: fake ASIC branding on social media
Millions of landlords the target of expanded ATO crackdown
Government urged to exempt small firms from TPB reforms
ATO warns businesses on looming TPAR deadline
How to read a Balance Sheet
Unregistered or Registered Trade Marks?
Most Popular Operating Systems 1999 - 2022
7 Steps to Dealing With a Legal Issue or Dispute
How Do I Resolve a Dispute With My Supplier?
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Government urged to exempt small firms from TPB reforms

The lower risk profile of small practices means they should not face the same scrutiny as larger ones, the NTAA says.



.


Small firms should be exempted from the government’s proposed TPB registration requirements as their lower risk profiles do not warrant the additional oversight, the National Tax & Accountants’ Association (NTAA) says.


Treasury’s proposal would allow the board to reject or terminate registrations of companies and partnerships based on more stringent criteria including their compliance with governance requirements.


But the NTAA was concerned the proposed change was “too broad in its application”.


“It is evident that the Treasury has reduced the scope of this proposed change to exclude individual tax agents. However, this exclusion does not go far enough,” it said in a recent submission to Treasury.


“The NTAA suggests reducing the scope of the proposed change to exclude small firms.”


“The lower risk level generally associated with smaller firms that operate as companies and partnerships does not warrant additional TPB oversight at the time of registration.”


It said the additional oversight of small firms was an unnecessary burden and provided no benefit to consumers.


But these concerns did not apply to large multidisciplinary firms that had a higher risk of encountering complex practice issues and ethical dilemmas.


“It is clear that the proposed change is intended to target large multidisciplinary firms. The NTAA is fully supportive of a reform that provides additional oversight of such firms,” it said.


“The proposed change would provide a safeguard of sorts to consumers, as it provides a level of comfort that registered companies and partnerships have appropriate controls in place.”


The NTAA said obligations imposed under the tax agent code of conduct would be adequate to deal with smaller firms, with a recent ministerial determination mandating a quality management system at the time of registration.


“The consultation paper proposes a change that would overlay an additional requirement that must be satisfied for certain types of firms to register as a tax agent,” it said.


It also echoed concerns of other professional bodies that having the stringent new criteria as a registration requirement raised procedural fairness concerns.


“Having the quality management system as a registration requirement rather than an ethical standard means that the TPB can decline a registration application by a prospective agent without having to do any real investigation, which would be required under an ethical standards breach,” it said.


“This does not provide the applicant with a fair and just outcome.”


 


 


 


 


Christine Chen
21 August 2024
accountantsdaily




20th-September-2024
      Site By PlannerWeb