eWombat search  

Financial Planning News

Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 4 October - December 2007
Quarter 3 July - September 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 1 January - March 2007
Quarter 4 October - December 2006
Quarter 3 July - September 2006
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 4 of 2015
Articles
Should we expect stormy skies or sunshine in 2016?
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 2015
There's no one-size-fits-all retirement income
Market Update – 30th November 2015
Diversifying and cutting costs with ETFs
Why the ATO’s new powers make SMSF compliance more important than ever
'Unretiring' retirees
The detrimental impact of poor SMSF record-keeping
Counting the cost of 'grey' divorce
Combining total-return investing with realistic investment expectations
Market Update – 31st October 2015
Another telling reminder for SMSF trustees
Death in paradise – or your SMSF
Elderly exploited for assets
Intergenerational challenges for retirement saving
Death benefits – navigating the minefield
Strategy over structure
Market Update – 3oth September 2015
SMSF and limited resource borrowing – a warning
External partnerships and the in-house asset rules
Take a closer look at SMSF age demographics
Strategy over structure

A key challenge investors face is separating the issue of investment strategy from the best way to implement it.


At times the discussion can quickly focus on implementation questions - best products, best structure - rather than the overall investment strategy.



                         


While the selection of the product vehicle is clearly important the pre-eminent decision for investors remains the asset allocation decision because that is what a deep body of research shows is the crucial determinant of your portfolio's performance.


The discussion between the investment strategy and the structure to implement it can easily become blurred. As investors it is natural to want to talk about what shares to buy, what property to look at, what manager's fund to consider...


An example recently has been some of the media debate about whether you are better off investing via exchange traded funds (ETFs) or traditional managed funds.


The debate has no doubt been fuelled by the continuing growth in popularity of ETFs - both in Australia and globally. As of June 30, 2015 total ETF assets stood at $US2.9 trillion which was 11% of total fund assets but what has been clear over the past 10 years is that ETFs have been growing at a faster rate to the traditional fund world.


While the Australian ETF market lagged the global trend initially in recent years it has also been growing strongly and this year to date around $4.5 billion has been invested in the Australian ETF market.


When it comes to any discussion around the right product or structure one simple rule overrides all others - if you do not understand it you should not invest in it. It is critical that as an investor you understand what you are investing in. That is also where getting specialist professional advice can be valuable because professional advisers ought to be able to explain the differences as well as any advantages and disadvantages that certain structures offer.


When it comes to ETFs versus managed a key point to understand is that they share more common characteristics than differences. They are both pooled vehicles that provide exposure to a range of markets and offer diversification usually at reasonable fees. They issue and redeem new units to meet investor demand.


With Vanguard most of our ETFs are a share class of the managed fund so ETF investors share a common investment pool with fund investors. What is different is the way that investment portfolio is accessed - the investor in the unlisted fund either invests via an adviser or directly. The ETF investor buys or sells via their broker and the ASX.


When deciding whether to implement your investment allocation via managed funds or ETFs (or a mix of both) there four factors worth considering: investment strategy, trading flexibility, accessibility and costs.


For investors the investment strategy question comes down to whether you want to take an actively managed approach or primarily an index-based with your portfolio. Most managed funds are actively managed while ETFs are mainly index-based strategies although the indexing concept has been expanded recently to include non-traditional indexes. In fact such indexes represent rules-based active strategies that attempt to outperform traditional market-cap-weighted benchmarks.


The ability to transact at the daily net asset value of a managed fund is likely to offer enough flexibility for most investors. However, the exchange-traded nature of ETFs does give investors more flexibility and the ability for intraday trading - albeit with brokerage costs to be taken into account.


Accessibility is also where some investors favor ETFs because investors have access to any ETF listed on the exchange where platforms used by advisory groups will typically have a restricted or approved product list.


Costs are a key consideration for investors in any investment product. With managed funds the major cost is the management expense ratio. With ETFs there will also be an underlying management expense ratio but you also need to factor in transaction costs for each time you trade.


Whether you opt for ETFs or traditional funds will depend on what type of investor you are.


What is key is to get establish the right strategy for you and then decide on the structure that will allow you to implement it the most cost-effective way possible.


 


By Robin Bowerman
Smart Investing 
Principal & Head of Retail, Vanguard Investments Australia
19 October 2015




25th-October-2015

        
FuturePlan Partners Pty Ltd, ACN 097 032 114, Corporate Authorised Representative of
SECURITOR Financial Group Limited, ABN 48 009 189 495, AFSL and Australian Credit License 240687,
Level 7, 530 Collins Street , Melbourne VIC 3000.